HIPAA Mandates & Meaningful Use in ECLIPSE

In July, 2011, I happened upon a competitor proudly noting the upcoming availabilty of a “prototype” ANSI 835 remittance file. (A remittance file is an electronic file provided by a payer. It contains info about the disposition of your claims and can be processed automatically by your software.)  The announcement gave the impression that this HIPAA mandate from October, 2002 — almost 10 years ago — was somehow brand new.

Today, doctors are concerned about Meaningful Use (if you’re unfamiliar with the term, read a brief overview here)… but it may not be the only important thing to evaluate when it comes to software. ECLIPSE is certified as a Complete EHR for Meaningful Use. But ECLIPSE incorporated features such as ANSI 835 & 837 electronic billing years ago when they were mandated by HIPAA — before we were “tested” to ensure we were helping you comply with the law. Suppose your software didn’t have adequate security features (also mandated by HIPAA) in 2010… and you were audited or sued? ECLIPSE has kept up with every relevant mandate since 1985. That’s a 25 year track record of meeting deadlines that affect how and whether you get paid, as well as how well protected you are.

So, the next time a sales rep tries to impress you with his/her company’s electronic billing expertise & capabilities, consider that, in 2003, before most HIPAA legislation went into effect, Blue Cross Blue Shield carriers across the United States arranged to do their initial claim testing with ECLIPSE as a partner, indicating that they’d “heard though the grapevine” that our personnel “knew what you were doing” and wanted to do their initial testing with ECLIPSE. We process millions of transactions for your colleagues every week and periodically re-certify our files to ensure compliance.

Posted in ANSI 5010, Evaluating Software, HIPAA | Comments Off on HIPAA Mandates & Meaningful Use in ECLIPSE

Review of Systems

An initial case history typically includes a long list of symptoms related to every system in the body. Our clinical experience has demonstrated that doctors often have distinctly varied lists of items in their respective “Review of Systems” (ROS). These can be long lists containing 50-100+ items. Then, doctors normally ask follow-up questions about the issues that have been checked by the patient.

I know from conversations with colleagues that items I give great weight to during ROS are not on their radar – and the reverse is true as well.

The preface on the first Encounter is a good place to write a synopsis of the ROS. It might read: Review of systems from case history form revealed: positive for asthma (trigger:
pollen) controlled by medication; high blood pressure (Dr. Barnes, internist
monitoring) and enlarged prostate (Dr. Barnes, internist monitoring).

Alternatively, the ECLIPSE KIOSK software can be used for new patient entry and has an extensive ROS built-in. It’s automatically imported to the patient’s EHR as a document when the new patient is imported into ECLIPSE.

Posted in Encounter / SOAP | Comments Off on Review of Systems

Chiropractic Audit: Watch those CPT Codes!

You’re with a patient. More are in the waiting room. There’s a commotion. Men in uniform sweep into your office and a guy in a suit brandishes official looking paperwork in your face. As they execute their search warrant, they take photographs, your computer, and some patient files. Then they leave you in a state of shock.

Think I created the above scenario to get your attention? Sorry to disappoint you. I was — as is often the case — part of the aftermath. Once they take your computer, they come to me. Over the past decade, scenarios like this are becoming more common. And you won’t see your colleagues blog about it either. Once they’re caught in the spotlight, it’s all they can do to catch a breath.

It could have been local law enforcement, but it’s more likely state or federal. For instance: DHHS/OIG, better known as the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General.

I know what you’re thinking. This goes way beyond an audit. These doctors must have done some pretty brazen things to merit a search warrant! I’d never do anything like that. Criminal? Fraud? Not possible!

Guess again. It’s easier than you think. One of the simplest ways to head down the path ultimately labeled  “fraud” is your CPT® codes. What problem could possibly result from your codes? Imagine that a CPT code you use regularly isn’t getting reimbursed. You’re buddy, Bob, let’s you know that he’s having better luck with a different code. Or perhaps your management consultant provides something better. The alternate doesn’t seem too different, so you switch. Later, this becomes part of your defense argument as you protest your innocence during talks over a two year period with the investigators sifting through your data.

Let’s look at an example. Suppose that 5 years ago you began using 97012 as part of your office visit to account for extended time with the patient. Today, you wonder why the investigators photograph your office as part of their intrusion. And later you learn they’re looking for mechanical traction equipment – which you don’t own. You tell your attorney that every chiropractor you know locally is using that code. Though the investigator is more sympathetic than you believe, her opinion is ultimately a simple one. At some point, it’s up to you to take responsibility for the CPT codes you submit on claim forms. And this code doesn’t reflect the service you actually provided. Since you don’t even own mechanical traction equipment, you committed fraud in the eyes of the investigator.
If you had provided extensive manual traction and recorded this in your notes regularly, you might convince the investigative team that the coding error was a mistake as opposed to fraud. Of course, that won’t relieve you of penalties and fines.

And let’s not forget about the future. One of the biggest potential problems you will have here is the damage to your reputation. In the above example, you can be sure that the investigators will interview your patients and get depositions to bolster their case for court or a plea agreement. Imagine what that does to the local grapevine.

The bottom line is: make sure you can justify the CPT codes you use daily.  Remember, if everyone is speeding on the highway, and you get pulled over because you’re doing it too…

Finally, everything you’ve read here is relevant to recent investigations – not hype to get your attention. Be careful out there.

CPT Copyright American Medical Association. All rights reserved. CPT® is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association.

Posted in Audit Savvy, Practice Management | Tagged | Comments Off on Chiropractic Audit: Watch those CPT Codes!

Performance in the Cloud

At 8am today, I created an electronic prescription — and managed to access the appropriate screens “in the cloud” in under 3 seconds. At 3:58pm, I needed to generate another prescription… and it took 20 seconds before the screen loaded. What’s going on?

At 8am in NY, the overwhelming majority of people on the West Coast were either asleep or getting ready to begin their day. Internet trraffic was light. And traffic across the prescription company’s web servers was probably light as well. By 4pm in NY, thousands of doctors (possibly tens of thousands) across the United States were all hitting the web server with prescription requests… and the volume began to overwhelm their web servers.

Anyone who has ordered something on the web and waited for their CC to get approved, or reviewed the TV lineup on DirecTV, or retrieved search lists on Amazon knows that –depending on time of day and other factors — the internet, as cool as it is, cannot always provide instant gratification.

The internet is portable. And it’s great for getting data (like today’s weather or your bank balance) fast anywhere. Unfortunately, it’s not as as great at getting lots of data fast — like when you need to review a patient’s account with hundreds or thousands of entries… or SOAP spanning a patient’s care over the past 6 months.

ECLIPSE offers the best of both worlds. Data such as educational resources, prescriptions and automated credit card storage — where performance isn’t generally time critical — are cloud based. Patients can even schedule their ECLIPSE appointments directly via the cloud. And providers can send updated data from their scheduler to the Google Calendar seamlessly in the background. But critical data, like the schedule for the entire week, or a patient’s account or EHR needs to be in front of you instantly — because seconds add up fast when patients are at the front desk, in the waiting room, and on the phone.

Posted in Cloud Computing | Tagged | Comments Off on Performance in the Cloud

Medication Reconciliation

As a computer professional with over 25 years of experience in health care, I spent months moving ECLIPSE through the maze to get it ONC-ATCB certified as a Complete EHR with CCHIT. I personally certified ECLIPSE on every possible measure, plowing through extensive test scripts and getting interpretations of test criteria from CCHIT and other sources.

Yesterday, a doctor told us that – when it comes to Medication Reconciliation (170.302j) – he’d rather take the word of all the “experts” he’s seen at seminars who indicated that he must perform medication reconciliation for all his patients.

So let’s examine the facts. First of all, once you own certified technology, the only things you’re responsible for reporting are covered in 170.302n – Automate measure calculation and 170.304j – Calculate and Submit Clinical Quality Measures. You may report on a subset of these – depending on your degree and scope of practice.

Next, let’s examine Appendix A from the CCHIT Automate measure calculation
test script. Here’s the only section that references medication reconciliation:

“The EP, eligible hospital or CAH who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation”

Thus, medication reconciliation is performed if a patient meets one of 2 conditions:

  • The patient was referred by or otherwise transitioned from another physician to your care.
  • You think it’s necessary.

And the requirement for Stage 1 is as follows:

“The EP, eligible hospital or CAH performs medication reconciliation for more than 50% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP…”

In other words, it’s not required that you actually perform any medication reconciliations unless your practice derives patients from physician referrals (or the patient switched doctors – which falls into the “you think it’s necessary” category in real life). And for patients who meet the criteria, if you perform the reconciliation for just over half of them, you’ve satisfied the requirement. Certified technology should handle both of the above situations and ECLIPSE is directly certified to perform medication reconciliation without 3rd party tools that require a subscription.

So… finally… how do you perform a medication reconciliation in ECLIPSE? Let’s return to the CCHIT test script language I used for the certification:

“Select an existing patient record and display two or more medication lists as separate lists. One list must be a current medication list in the patient’s electronic record.  Compare the two lists.”

ECLIPSE maintains a medication list internally as part of the patient’s EHR on the History tab. Simply right-click for the context-sensitive menu, change the view and compare. You’ve just performed a medication reconciliation.

Posted in Meaningful Use Resources | Tagged | Comments Off on Medication Reconciliation

Safety & HIPAA in the Cloud

It’s unusual for a month to go by without a serious breach of some company’s or government’s data. For example, according to the New York Times, records for 1.7 million patients, staff members, and contractors at a NYC hospital were stolen recently.  Serious issues exist with regard to data security and privacy. Given HIPAA, these concerns are especially problematic for health care. An article in the January, 2011 issue of Communications of the ACM –Computer Science’s equivalent of the New England Journal of Medicine, noted that

“The problem of data privacy in general is of course well known, but cloud computing magnifies it”

along with

“Policies are a first step, but alone they are insufficient to prevent cloud service providers from abusing the data entrusted to them.”

All other considerations aside — and there are many on both sides of the equation — given the fines for HIPAA violations, I’m not ready to commit my data to someone else’s computers.

Posted in Cloud Computing | Comments Off on Safety & HIPAA in the Cloud